| A Bipolar Transmission Line Project --
the TLB |
|
| Section 5 System Frequency Response |
The TL's system response (1 meter response), is defined by the near field woofer's
response summed with the TL's terminus near field response. At FR the
TL's resonance frequency, this summation is a vector addition since the phase of
the woofer differs from the phase of the terminus by about 90°
at optimum Dtr. The near field woofer's response is a product of the drivers
T/S parameters as loaded by the impedance of the TL line. As previously shown the
impedance changes as the line is stuffed. Also the statement was made that the TL's
woofer's response is equivalent to that of the critically damped closed box response,
ie Qtc =0.5.
This equivalency can be used to model the expected response of a specific driver
in a TL by examining the drivers response for a Qtc=0.5 by simply increasing
the VB for a closed box.
The fig. 5.0 graph shows the modeled response for a KEF B110 for a closed box, Qtc=0.707,
dashed line and a critically damped Qtc=0.50 system, solid line and the
measured response for the driver in a TL=0.944 meter line, dotted line.In a general
case the TL near field response is equivalent to the criticaly damped closed box
response, i.e. Qtc = 0.50. From this data we can extrapolate that the
driver is theoretically suited for a Fr~40Hz. or a TL length ~ 2 meters.
Achieving the theoretical is skill and fiber characteristics dependent |

Fig. 5.0 TL near field vs.
closed box Qtc=0.50 response
click image for larger picture
|
|
|

Fig. 5.1 TL 1 meter system
response
Fig. 5.1 shows the optimum stuffed line, TLB system response, for wool
fiber and for Dacron Holofill II fiber. Note that the Dt values are different
for the two fiber types. A brief characterization of fiber type dependency will be
given later. For the moment I'll give a short explanation of the data for Fig. 5.1.
The peak @ 65 Hz is TL line length dependent and the following null is related to
the 1st harmonic, the second peak is 2nd. harmonic related
and the 2nd null is 3rd harmonic related. The relative amplitude
of these is defined by the line stuffing density Dt and is fiber type
dependent. The frequency position of these harmonics will also shift due to the fiber
effect of the change of speed of sound in the line. The design relationship is quite
complex. For instance, if the drivers Fs is lower then it might be possible
to overstuff the line and thus reduce the null amplitude.
|
| Since the TLB uses two drivers in an push-push configuration
the line is pressurized quite differently from that of a standard TL and the Dt
value has to be adjusted. The effect is illustrated in Fig. 5.2. The top curve is
for the push-push response and the bottom for a single driver with the same Dt
value. This illustrates in a rough way the change in TL system response as Dt
is adjusted for optimum value. Note that while the null frequencies are fixed the
peak values being dependent on the fiber attenuation characteristics, change in amplitude. |

Fig. 5.2 TLB
Frequency Response vs. Dt value
click image for larger picture
|
|
| Fig. 5.3 is the comparison of the TL terminus
response for the bipole, top curve and for the monopole with the same Dt
value. The very interesting difference is the widening of the bandwidth for the push-push
driver configuration. Also note that the magnitude of the bipole is about 10dB. higher
than for the monopole. Changing the Dt value it would be possible to increase
the Terminus gain for a monopole configuration so that the system response would
be about the same. The TL36 configuration was used as a base line for the TLB,
thus this is not a supposition. The bandwidth widening suggests that the bipole configuration
would permit a drivers Fs somewhat higher since the effective Terminus
bandwidth is wider than 3 octaves. |

Fig. 5.3 TLB
Frequency Response vs. Terminus Response
click image for larger picture
|
|
TL Line Stuffing Instructions
The line is stuffed using long–haired wool @ a Dtr = 8.2 or Dt
= 0.6 lbs/cu.ft. For TLB, this is equal to ~ 13.9 oz. The line stuffing
should be homogenous and should be installed after the column damping panels have
been installed and before the remaining side of the column is glued.
The effects of the line stuffing have previously been discussed in the impedance
data plot examples. However the major effects are shown in the TL's
Terminus Response Data for Dtr and the accompanying frequency shifts
of the harmonics and primarily of the phase @ Fr which defines the TL
system response.
|
| TL Fiber Characteristics |
| To understand the TL design and especially the TL non-linearity that takes place
for a design where the line length is greater than about 1.5 meters, we have to understand
fiber related effects on attenuation and the speed of sound change in the line. These
factors are defined by the Bradbury fiber
equations and here I can but give a very short summary since a fuller treatment
is possible as solutions to the wave equations which define the attenuation and change
in speed of sound in the fiber mass and are density related. |
|

Fig. 5.4 Fiber Attenuation
Characteristics
click image for larger picture
|

Fig. 5.5 Fiber Change in
Speed of Sound Characteristics
click image for larger picture
|
|
Fig.5.4 and fig.5.5 show the fiber related (fiberglass / wool) characteristics for
attenuation and for change of speed of sound in the fiber mass vs. frequency. If
you examine fig.5.5 you'll note that the fiberglass curve bottoms out @ about 50
Hz. This defines the non-linearity region of the TL design. The wool curve is slightly
better indicating that wool could be used for ~ a 2 meter line, as was used by Bailey.
Below 30 Hz a new type of fiber must be found; Miraflex seems a likely candidate.
However TL design for sub use is very problematic.
Fig. 5.6 shows the change in D c as a
function of stuffing density Dt. It should be obvious that Dt
value will vary with TL line length since higher values will be required to achieve
the desired D c and thus the required
phase shift at the terminus, consequently the TL system response magnitude @ Fr.
This data graphically contradicts Dt formulas as used in Q&E TL Design. |

Fig. 5.6 Fiber Change in
Speed of Sound Characteristics vs. Dt
click image for larger picture
|
|
Low Frequency THD characterization
The graph shows the Harmonic distortion characteristics of the TLB. Note
that the data has to be read from 60Hz the limit of the TL design. The 1% value indicates
a very low value since comparable low frequency designs generally are at the 4% range.
The THD is about 0.5% for the remaining range.
The data shown is for the undamped TL case. |

Fig. 5.7 TLB
THD
click image for larger picture
|
|
|
[ Contents | Introduction | Methodology | Radiation Response | Transient Response | Frequency Response | Construction ]
|